🔗 Share this article

Initially, the former US president appeared to embrace a strong stance on Ukraine. Following making statements of "serious ramifications" last August if Russia's president continued blocking peace talks, he eventually enacted considerable penalties on the Russian biggest petroleum corporations, Rosneft and Lukoil. This decision significantly affected Putin's ability to support his aggression in Ukraine.

Yet, through his recently unveiled 28-point peace proposal for the conflict, reportedly created by both nations' officials lacking Ukraine's or EU participation, the former president has apparently reverted to his Russia-friendly approach.

Rewarding Military Action

This initiative would effectively reward Putin for invading Ukraine while placing the country's democracy in jeopardy. Despite ringing statements that "Ukraine's independence will be affirmed", significant aspects of the initiative effectively undermine that same autonomy. Seen as a Russian ideal would likely be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his real-estate past, Trump persists to consider the war as a basic border issue, like ceding Putin a part of Ukraine's soil will please the ruler. However, Russia's invasion is not only about dominating a destroyed swath of industrial-devastated territory in Ukraine's east. Rather, it is about Ukraine's political system – and the Russian leader's clear desire to weaken it so it stops serves as an attractive standard for the Russia's population of the responsible governance that Putin's deepening authoritarian rule prevents them.

Border Surrenders

Although maintaining in status the currently split regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's proposal would require Ukraine to give up the entire this eastern territory. In addition to favoring the Russian Federation with area that its troops have been unable to occupy in exceeding a decade of warfare, this concession would leave Ukraine's military defenses severely compromised.

This region is the place of the nation's well-known "stronghold system", the entrenched protective structures that represent a key obstacle to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these fortifications, providing Russian forces a open path to the capital in case he later opt to resume the hostilities.

Military Limitations

Then, in a move that would facilitate renewed conflict more feasible for the Russian military, Trump would require the nation to reduce the scale of its armed forces from their present 800,000 to 850,000 personnel to a maximum of 600,000. Notably, the proposal imposes no equivalent limits on the invading army.

In what appears as a gesture to Putin's attempts to characterize the nation's democratically elected government as extremists, the proposal states: "All extremist belief system and actions must be condemned and banned." Apparently to emphasize this point, it insists that "The nation will hold political contests in 100 days" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, Trump imposes no condition that Putin endanger his authoritarian rule by holding elections in his own country.

Defense Assurances

To be sure, the proposal includes the Russian Federation promise not to "invade bordering nations" and to "establish in regulation its policy of non-violence towards European nations and Ukraine". But given that the Russian leadership has broken equivalent agreements in the past – such as the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government pledged to recognize the nation's sovereignty in return for giving up its historical nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Russia committed to a ceasefire and a return of occupied land in eastern Ukraine to Ukrainian control – why should anyone trust Russia this time?

For this reason the Ukrainian government has been so determined on international defense commitments. While the plan promises a "decisive unified defense action" should Russia renew its invasion, and provides that "The nation will receive strong defense commitments", the particulars include unclear to troubling. The plan would not just prevent the nation Nato membership but also preclude Nato members from stationing troops on Ukraine's soil, thus preventing the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly headed by the UK and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to stop Putin from replenishing his weakened military, rearming, and reinvading.

Global Concern

An additional supplementary accord reportedly would provide Ukraine with a alliance-like protection assurance, in which any subsequent "major, planned, and ongoing armed attack" by the Russian Federation on the country "would be considered as an attack endangering the peace and security of the transatlantic community." That suggests a defense action. But in contrast to a capable Ukrainian military – Ukraine's most reliable defense against renewed Russian aggression – the success of the side agreement would hinge on the willingness of Nato leaders, including Trump, to act through arms to Russia's hostilities, a response they have {not