🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where Black people are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.