🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.