🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that states internationally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.