🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many contenders. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured various figures, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the process said the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.