A Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: How Affluence and Hardship Are Found Side by Side in England.
Within Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in homes just several yards from their more affluent counterparts in the adjacent Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally divides the two areas in the town of Grimsby, sealing off paths and streets that once connected them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” remarked Serenity Colley, 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from official figures reveals the extent of inequality can run, sometimes over nothing more than a few metres of asphalt, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now contain a locality classified as one of the poorest in the nation.
This geographical widening of deprivation has led to a significant increase in the number of locations where disadvantaged and affluent people find themselves as immediate neighbours. In 2019, just 65 of the most deprived areas adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Space
In Grimsby, the divide is the biggest in the UK and starkly apparent. The wall is much more than a metaphorical divide; it creates tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- The school commute that ought to take a quarter of an hour become an hour-long journey.
- Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The site often sees vandalism and loitering, with instances of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the corroded metal wall.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At Centre4, workers emphasise that need does not recognise postcodes. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” said director Tracey Good.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, Scartho ranks among the most prosperous 10% overall.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and living environment.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The financial divide is clear: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide comparable homes fetch about £410,000.
Locals speak of a palpable feeling of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our amenities have gradually disappeared, and most of the community problems here are related to poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a picture of an ever more segregated England, where wealth and need are frequently uncomfortably close neighbours.